For those of you who haven’t been keeping up to date on the news, there was a Military backed Coup D’Etat in Thailand, centreing on BKK, Tuesday evening. Currently, things are very calm and no blood has been shed. Yesterday a lot of people were getting the news of what was happening and waiting to see how a few key things would proceed. The now previous PM seems to not be retaliating against the Coup, and the King has more or less given his consent to the same – which has meant things have been very calm. The Thais love there King, for good reason I feel, and if he had not given his approval of the current changes it would be a lot more tense and possibly violent right now.
For the most part the Coup really does seem to be focused on removing the previous PM from office because of the harm his Gov’t has caused Thailand. If in deed there is a civilian Gov’t in place in two weeks as the military leaders have promised, than it does even look like things will progress well and possibly even be for the better. Of course who becomes the interim PM will make a big difference as well. A proper election won’t happen until next year sometime, possibly even not until Oct 2007, so it’s a long road ahead.
Waiting to see what has been going on, watching how things have progressed, and getting back into daily life routine has been interesting – if not down right odd. It feels very strange to have been here for what could possibly turn out to be a bloodless coup.
One thing that has bothered me lately, though, from reading the news reports online from overseas papers, is the demands that other ‘democratic’ countries have been brandishing about and pronouncements foreign govt’s have been making upon Thailand. I enjoy democracy, but other democratic nations issuing official statements decrying what is happening in another democratic country, demanding that that country returns to ‘Democracy’, I find questionable. Especially when some of those countries are currently meddling in other democractic countries, have been known to compromise or ignore democratic policies in other nations, and even overthrown other democratic countries to protect ‘foreign interests’. (There is a lot of foreign interest in Thailand remaining a strong democracy and open market in South East Asia.)
I can’t help but feel that this international concept of ‘Democracy’, like the ‘Free Market’, is a rolled-up newspaper that is used to smack other nations about the head when they have ‘peed on the carpet’. Yes, democracy is great, but it is honestly not the only system of governance nor the only way to achieve change in a nation. The current Coup may not have been the best way to affect change in Thailand – when viewed from a foreign standpoint bent on upholding ‘pure’ democracy – but if there’s one thing I’ve learned from living here for, what is closing in on, 2 years, can any foreigner really understand Thai politics?
Democracy is probably the best system we have presently, helping us manage an increasingly complex world, but that does not mean that it is a perfect ideal that must be preserved at all costs in all situations. Especially not as a political panacea when spoken from the mouths of hypocritical foreign govt’s. Would the tension and conflict that has been plagueing Thai politics since February of this year have disappeared after another election? The leaders of the Coup would probably argue no, and, with my limited understanding of Thai politics as it is, I would pretty much have to agree.